| Description of work This WP will first focus on the lessons learned from the existing Internet security paradigm and the specification of the new security challenges, such as anonymity, reliability and self-protection, of the envisioned architecture of the forthcoming Internet. To this end, the Quality of Protection (QoP), that is the set of the features such as security, trust and the protection against attacks will be bound to the Quality of Services (QoS) that the future Internet supports. The state-of-the-art of the security, privacy, self-protection and trust mechanisms, architectures and protocols will be reported. Finally, innovative security, privacy, network protection, and trust establishment schemes will be designed, examined, and evaluated in real or simulated environments, in terms of applicability, performance, reliability, scalability and robustness. Task 1: Lessons Learned from the existing Internet security paradigm Starting from this activity this taskwill first evaluate the existing security frameworks that reside on the Internet, trying to answer why a lot of scepticism is still valid for the effectiveness of the existing and applicable security mechanisms, protocols and architectures. Why threats are still exist in the data link, network, transport and application layers, and how the engineering of the Internet security failed to respond. Task 2: Security, Privacy, Availability and Trust Challenges of the Future Internet This taskwill consider the future Internet, Internet in general and its new service architectures (see JRA 1.7) and what new challenges are introduced in the security concepts. It will address how QoP fits to the QoS, it will consider the new distributed, AmI paradigm and the miniature networking and computing facilities, as well as how the new integrated media architecture (data, voice, media broadcasting) revises the security, privacy, trust and network protection concepts. Task 3: State of the art report on Future Internet security In this task a survey of the future internet security, privacy, availability and trust mechanisms, protocols and architectures will be reported. Theoretical evaluation of these schemes will be performed in terms of challenges identified during the previous activity. At this end, the new security challenges and the state-of-the-art review have been contacted, and, thus, some of the security, privacy, availability and trust mechanisms, protocols and architectures will be considered for further research that will take place in task 4. Task 4: Future Internet Security Architecture We foresee three main directions of this activity. The first one deals with traditional security and privacy aspects in the network, such as authentication, confidentiality, non-repudiation, integrity, authorization, anonymity etc. The second activity, availability services, focuses on the network and individual node’s protection from attacks, focussing on prevention models. Finally, the Trust Services activities deal with the evaluation of trust on services, nodes, and people. Sub-Task 4.1 Network Security and Privacy Services In this sub-task the project will investigate, study, design and evaluate: - Approaches that define and disseminate toolboxes of low-cost, efficient, security and privacy primitives that can be assembled and used with various Internet protocols
- Protocols and models that enable the adaptive set-up of security and privacy services, based on high-level profiles of the services, sessions and end-users
- AAA schemes for multi-domain environment
- Methods that mitigate security and privacy overheads and produce more efficient implementations of security components, stacks and architectures
- Assessment methods of the mechanisms that support security and privacy. Definition of new evaluation criteria and metrics, modelling, building and evaluating secure implementations using simulation, analytical reasoning (including formal methods), and real-life data
- New, efficient, scalable, security and privacy approaches for supporting Internet protocols in the areas of addressing, dynamic host configuration, routing/forwarding, naming, and mobility
- Novel privacy enhancement technologies as a fundamental tool for Internet users to enhance the current level of anonymity, unlinkability, and unobservability services that help to bridge the gap between the need to protect the anonymity of the end-user and the need for collective security
- High-level security and policy definition languages to minimize the required level of end-users’ knowledge on security and privacy techniques, offering understandable definitions
- Physical-Layer and Link-Layer Security, exploiting the intrinsic security of network coding (i.e. mixing of different flows by means of coding) to devise security solutions; identifying the vulnerabilities of currently proposed cooperation schemes at the physical layer (“user cooperation diversity”) and developing security mechanisms under this new paradigm
Sub-Task 4.2 Network Protection and Availability Services In this sub-task the project will investigate, study, design and evaluate: - Models and architectures for the self-protection of networks, as well as, the autonomous adaptation of networking devices to changes in threats.
- Attack identification (early warning) and prevention tools, such as epidemic models
- Self-protection clustering architectures that force network support for end-node security, by distributing fire walling functions in the network.
- New network forensics tools to be used as an input for analysing, evaluating and preventing similar or correlated attack in the FI
- Analytical or empirical methods to evaluate the capability of protection solutions to prevent or recover from attacks.
Sub-Task 4.3 Trust Services In this activity the project will investigate, study, design and evaluate: - The usage of economic and social models for measuring and modelling trust, including tools for analysing and validating the trust properties of network elements and services.
- Architectures that support secure and authenticated trust assertions, and recommendations, such as overlays, especially in the Cross-Domain and Multi-Domain paradigm
Trusted behaviour enforcement tools, such as reputation, incentives and economic models, with the goal of attaining a network equilibrium which is satisfactory only for those nodes which play by the rules of the protocol. |